by Dr. G. Terry Madonna and Dr. Michael Young
Pennsylvania has conducted some big elections lately: big presidential races, big gubernatorial races, and big congressional races. Indeed, big, important, and eventful elections have become a regular feature of the State’s political landscape.
So, it might surprise some to learn that the next big electoral contest in Pennsylvania is not a high stakes, high profile, federal or state race, but instead a local struggle for control of a few courthouses in the Philadelphia suburbs.
Just why a couple of local contests in a handful of counties weigh that heavily is a fair question. Certainly, county races aren’t usually awarded top billing in Pennsylvania. Just the opposite is true; historically these races are low cost and low interest affairs, participated in by a modest few and remembered by even fewer.
But not this year!
This year, the elections in Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery Counties have huge implications for the political future of Pennsylvania; this year what happens in the suburbs matters far beyond the suburbs.
Why is that the case?
The answer is rooted in Pennsylvania’s tradition of strong local political parties. The party that controls county government is usually able to translate that control into electoral success beyond local offices. To rule a county government often means that the party will probably be successful in state and federal elections as well.
That matters this year because, for the first time in decades, the Philly suburbs are up for grabs. One or more of the counties seem poised to jump parties--from the Republicans to the Democrats.
The consequences of this are enormous for the balance of power in state politics. For decades, support from these suburban Philadelphia counties has been crucial for GOP success statewide. To control the State, Republicans needed the suburbs. But beginning in the 1990’s, the suburbs began to tilt toward the Democrats in some very important elections.
This erosion in GOP support can be traced across presidential, statewide, and congressional elections.
Both demographic and ideological forces underlie the erosion of GOP support. Suburban voters, many of whose parents or grandparents adopted the Republican Party when they fled Philadelphia, have become more willing to vote for Democrats. They are boosted by in-migration from new voters, of whom many are employed in the high tech, healthcare, and financial institutions that have less allegiance to the Republican Party.
Ideological shifts have also played a role in the switch away from Republicans. Suburban voters are markedly more moderate on the great social questions of the day, especially on abortion, gay marriage, gun control, and federal funding of stem cell research. While still fiscally conservative, suburban voters have grown restive in a party often dominated by social conservatives.
These trends are as ominous for Republicans as they are sanguine for Democrats. Even more important; however, they are pregnant with political implications for Pennsylvania’s role in regional and national politics.
In particular, three consequences are likely if the trend to Democrats continues in the suburbs.
So, improbably enough a handful of local races in an off year election may shape the course of state politics for some time. Should one or more of the Philly suburban counties go Democratic this year, it will portend bleak prospects for Republican hopes in future state and national elections.
Politically Uncorrected™ is published twice monthly. Dr. G. Terry Madonna is a Professor of Public Affairs at Franklin & Marshall College, and Dr. Michael Young is a former Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Penn State University and Managing Partner at Michael Young Strategic Research. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any institution or organization with which they are affiliated. This article may be used in whole or part only with appropriate attribution. Copyright © 2007 Terry Madonna and Michael Young.