by Dr. G. Terry Madonna and Dr. Michael Young
Is it over? Could the lights be dimming on Pennsylvania’s long-playing role as a national electoral battleground?
At first blush, the question seems improbable. Certainly no one doubts the state’s importance in this year’s presidential election. Its 21 electoral votes make it one of the top prizes in the Electoral College sweepstakes. Moreover, Pennsylvania’s role as a presidential battleground state has been a fixture of national politics for decades.
Presidential elections have been fiercely competitive in the Keystone State. Of the past seven, Democrats have won four and Republicans three. In 2004 Pennsylvania was the most visited state by the presidential candidates, and it’s among the most visited in 2008. In fact, this year three of the state’s TV markets have ranked among the top 20 for candidate spending in the entire country. Given these circumstances it might seem strange to argue that Pennsylvania’s exalted status as a battleground state may be ending. Yet that is precisely the case.
Considering just why Pennsylvania has been a battleground state for so long is critical to any understanding of why that might not be the case much longer. One part of the equation is the state’s powerhouse Electoral College vote – 21 electoral votes – all cast for the state winner. But there are other states with many more electoral votes: neighboring New York (31); Texas (34); and of course California (55). None of these are competitive states, however, because they are "safe" for one of the two parties – lead pipe, "sure things." It is the prospect of Pennsylvania becoming a sure thing for the Democratic Party that imperils its role as a battleground state in 2012 and beyond.
The most immediate danger to Pennsylvania’s battleground state status is the prospect of an Obama victory this year. If Pennsylvania votes Democratic in 2008, it will be five elections in a row Democrats have won the state. A state that votes five times in a row for the same party over almost a quarter century of voting isn’t purple anymore.
But a McCain loss in the state, if it occurs, is only the tip of a very large electoral iceberg menacing Republican viability in Pennsylvania. Beyond this election, several significant political trends are coalescing to move the state solidly into the "blue" column. These electoral, demographic, and socioeconomic influences may mark 2008 as the last hurrah for Pennsylvania as a battleground state. Collectively, they threaten the competitive nature of the state and could move it perilously close to tilting decisively into the Democratic column much like neighboring New Jersey.
Three trends bear particular emphasis:
If Pennsylvania does become "safe" for Democrats after the 2008 election, it won’t be historically unprecedented. In fact, playing the role of "safe" state is familiar ground for the Keystone State. From the Civil War until the New Deal, Pennsylvania was a reliable vote for GOP presidential candidates. Only in the second half of the 20th century did it become a truly competitive two-party state. And only in the five decades since 1960 has it been a presidential battleground state.
Nevertheless, a solid blue Pennsylvania would constitute a seismic shift across the partisan spectrum – stretching from safe Republican to highly competitive and finally to safe Democrat. Such a shift would have enormous political implications, radically altering future Electoral College maps, thereby making it ever more difficult for the GOP to win national elections. If 2008 is Pennsylvania’s last hurrah, it’s a hurrah bound to echo loudly across national politics for elections to come.
Politically Uncorrected™ is published twice monthly. Dr. G. Terry Madonna is a Professor of Public Affairs at Franklin & Marshall College, and Dr. Michael Young is a former Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Penn State University and Managing Partner at Michael Young Strategic Research. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any institution or organization with which they are affiliated. This article may be used in whole or part only with appropriate attribution. Copyright © 2008 Terry Madonna and Michael Young.