ADHD Documentation Guidelines
Guidelines for Documentation of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Please refer to General Guidelines for Disability Documentation in addition to these specific guidelines for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The general guidelines are available at either the Disability Services office or online at:
Neuropsychological or psycho-educational assessments are generally needed to determine the current impact of the condition on the individual’s academic functioning. Due to the challenge of distinguishing normal behaviors and developmental patterns of adolescents and adults (e.g., procrastination, disorganization, distractibility, restlessness, boredom, academic under-achievement or failure, low self-esteem, chronic tardiness or in-attendance) from clinically significant impairment, a multifaceted evaluation should address the intensity and frequency of the symptoms and whether these behaviors constitute an impairment which substantially limits a major life activity.
The following guidelines describe the necessary components of acceptable documentation for students with ADHD. Students are encouraged to provide their clinicians with a copy of these guidelines.
1. The evaluation must be performed by a qualified individual: Testing must be performed by a qualified evaluator who has had training in and direct experience with adults with ADHD and who is unrelated to the student by birth or marriage. Testing must be performed by a clinical or educational psychologists, neuropsychologists, or physicians known to specialize in adult ADHD. Information about their professional credentials, including licensing and certification, and their areas of specialization must be clearly listed in the report. The College reserves the right to require that a certified copy of the report be transmitted directly from the evaluator to the College.
2. Currency of documentation: Testing must be current, that is, generally administered within the past five years. Although ADHD is generally considered to be lifelong, because the provision of all reasonable accommodations and services is based upon assessment of the current impact of the student’s disabilities on their academic performance, it is necessary to provide current documentation. Updates should be provided when relevant changes in behavior or medication occur.
3. Diagnostic Interview: The interview must include the following information, as well as evidence of third party confirmation of symptoms:
- Evidence that the condition was exhibited in childhood in more than one setting (as per criteria in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual – 5.
- A history of the individual’s presenting attentional symptoms and evidence of current impulsive/hyperactive or inattentive behaviors, as well as relevant medication history, must also be included.
4. Relevant Testing:
- Actual scores from all instruments must be provided with standard scores and percentile rank scores.
- The most recent edition of each assessment instrument must be administered.
- The report must indicate the norm-reference group. For example, the report must specifically indicate how the student performs in relationship to the average person in the general population.
The following areas must be addressed using standardized instruments:
Aptitude: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV) with subtest scores, the Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update Tests of Cognitive Ability, and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-IV are examples of tests that assess aptitude. Brief versions or screening measures are not comprehensive, including the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised, and are not accepted.
Achievement: Assessment of comprehensive academic achievement in the areas of reading (decoding and comprehension), mathematics (calculation and problem solving), oral language, and written expression (spelling, punctuation, capitalization, writing samples) is required.
- The Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) is NOT a comprehensive measure of achievement and therefore should not be the only measure of overall achievement utilized.
Cognitive and Information Processing: Specific areas of cognitive and information processing must be assessed. These domains include, but are not limited to:
- Memory (i.e., visual and verbal acquisition, retrieval, retention, and recognition).
- Processing speed and cognitive fluency (e.g., timed psychomotor or graphomotor tasks, decision and naming fluency).
- Attention (e.g., visual and auditory spans of attention, scanning tasks, and vigilance assessment, including continuous performance tasks).
- Sensory-perceptual functioning (e.g., high-level visual, auditory, and tactile tasks).
- Executive functioning (e.g., planning, organization, prioritization, sequencing, self-monitoring).
- Motor functioning (e.g., tests of dexterity and handedness).
- Visual acuity and possible need for prescription eye glasses.
6. Rating Scales: Self-rated or interviewer-rated scales for categorizing and quantifying the nature of the impairment are required in conjunction with other data. Examples of acceptable measures include, but are not limited to:ADHD Rating Scale IV, Beck Depression Inventory (BAI), Brown Attention-Deficit Disorders Scale, Conners’ Rating Scales-3 (Conners 3), Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales – Self and observer forms (CAARS), Attention Deficit Disorder Evaluation Scale (ADDES-3): Home and Self Report versions, and the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS).
7. Specific diagnosis: This should not merely refer to symptoms but should correspond to a specific diagnosis as per the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual – 5. Based on the current predominant features, the appropriate sub-type should accompany the diagnosis.
8. Clinical Summary: A narrative clinical summary must include the following:
• An indication that other possible causes of the presenting behavior have been ruled out.
• A statement indicating whether the student was taking medication at the time of the evaluation and how the results were affected.
• A description of functional limitations and the impact of the condition on the student’s current participation in courses, programs, services, or any other activities of the College.
• A statement as to what major life activity(ies) is substantially limited by the student’s condition(s) and a rating of the limitation, such as mild, moderate, substantial or severe of each affected major life activity, both with and without the use of mitigating measures, such as treatment and medication.
• Discussion of the student’s use of medication and its ameliorative effects.
• Recommendations for academic or other accommodations, including a rationale for each, linked to specific test results.
Please also note that a clinical diagnosis of ADHD or related prescription of medication does not necessarily justify the provision of accommodations. Sufficient documentation generally must be provided to demonstrate that the student requires specific accommodations in the College setting, despite the use of mitigating measures.
Students without a clinical diagnosis of ADHD who suspect that they are experiencing symptoms of ADHD should first see a clinician for a formal screening before seeking a full evaluation.