F&M Stories
F&M Researcher: Makeup on Certain Defendants Influences Jury Decisions
Middle-aged female defendants who wear makeup during their trial get a courtroom advantage, according to the latest study led by a Franklin & Marshall College researcher.
The study is the first to examine the effects of cosmetics on jury verdicts and sentences. Given that makeup increases attractiveness, an advantage for defendants, but also increases apparent age in young faces, a disadvantage, the researchers wanted to determine what the overall effect of cosmetics would have on jury decisions.
Conducted by F&M Assistant Professor of Psychology Carlota Batres and Psychology Professor Richard Russell at Gettysburg College, the study found that regardless of makeup application, male and female participants were more likely to assign guilty verdicts to middle-aged female defendants than young female defendants.
“Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that apparent age has a stronger effect
on jury decisions than attractiveness.”
The psychologists also found that male participants gave young female defendants in makeup longer sentences while middle-aged female defendants in makeup received shorter sentences, when compared to the same faces without makeup.
“Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that apparent age has a stronger effect on jury decisions than attractiveness,” Batres said.
Take the 1992 case of Amy Fisher, a Long Island teenager who shot the wife of her alleged lover. During her nationally publicized trial, experts following the case called her appearance – dark suit and makeup – the wrong presentation for the jury.
“I would have put her in a French schoolgirl dress with a big collar, a dark color, ribbon in her hair, no makeup. Make her look as young and innocent as possible,” Harry Munsinger, an attorney and trial consultant, told the Los Angeles Times.
Batres said that Munsinger may have been on to something since at the time of her trial, Amy Fisher was 18 years old and, according to this new research, wearing cosmetics could have made her look more guilty. While attorneys and consultants often advise their female clients what makeup to wear for trial, this is the first research that shows scientific evidence of the effects of cosmetics on jury decisions, Batres said.
The journal, Cosmetics, published “Examining the Influence of Cosmetics on Jury Decisions” this week.
Related Articles
April 22, 2026
Winging It: F&M Supercomputer Powers Biologist’s Local Conservation Efforts
For this Franklin & Marshall biologist, every bird song and flap of wings is essential data. With the support of the campus supercomputers, Dan Ardia and his student researchers are decoding the language of nature to better understand how Lancaster’s biodiversity and community can thrive together.
April 15, 2026
NBA's Ali Narracci ’22 Shares Sports Industry Secrets
Working for the NBA is anything but typical. Ali Narracci ’22 wouldn't have it any other way. See the top five leadership lessons she’s learned as assistant manager of global marketing partnerships at the NBA.
April 1, 2026
Tackling the Impacts of Ocean Climate Change Through High-Performance Computing
Pennsylvania may be landlocked, but geography is no barrier for this Franklin & Marshall marine biochemist. By leveraging a powerful supercomputer, Peter Fields and his student researchers are tackling ocean climate change from the heart of Lancaster.